Legal Opinion
United States v. Kohring
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided March 11, 2011No. 08-30170PublishedCited by 65 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by Judge THOMAS; Partial Concurrence and Partial Dissent by Judge B. FLETCHER.
OPINION
THOMAS, Circuit Judge:
Victor Kohring filed this appeal after being convicted of three public corruption charges. While the case was pending on appeal, we remanded it to the district court for the limited purpose of determining whether the government had breached its disclosure obligations under Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83, 83 S.Ct. 1194, 10 L.Ed.2d 215 (1963), and Giglio v. United States, 405 U.S. 150, 92 S.Ct. 763, 31 L.Ed.2d 104 (1972), and, if so, the remedy to which Kohring is entitled. The…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- United States v. BagleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Giglio v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Delaware v. Van ArsdallSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Davis v. AlaskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by65 opinions
- Jesse Gonzalez v. Robert WongCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- United States v. WilkesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- State v. WARRIORSupreme Court of Kansas · 2012
- United States v. John DoeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
- United States v. Kenneth OlsenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.