Legal Opinion

City of Beverly Hills v. Anger

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 28, 1932No. Docket No. 4574PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THOMPSON (R. L.), J.

This is an appeal on the part of certain defendants from an interlocutory decree of condemnation of a strip of land consisting of thirty-two lots adjacent to the northerly border of Santa Monica Boulevard in the City of Beverlv Hills, to be used as a public park.

The appellants contend the awards are grossly inadequate to conpensate them for the values of the condemned properties, and that the court erred in the admission of evidence respecting the market value of these lots. The chief attack is directed toward the admission in evidence of a zoning ordinance which restricts…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Spring Valley Water Works v. DrinkhouseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  2. East Bay Municipal Utility District v. KiefferCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
  3. Peters v. BucknerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1921
  4. Phillips v. LyonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
  5. Los Angeles City High School District v. HyattCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Barnes v. North Carolina State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
  2. People v. La MacChiaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Long Beach City High School District v. StewartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  4. In Re Armory Site in Kansas CitySupreme Court of Missouri · 1955
  5. City of Los Angeles v. ColeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API