Legal Opinion
In Re Chisholm
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided July 3, 1996No. 95-BG-1030PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SCHWELB, Associate Judge.
The Board on Professional Responsibility has recommended that Charles E. Chisholm, a member of our Bar, be suspended from practice for six months and that he be required, as a condition of reinstatement, to pay $1,000, with interest, as restitution. Chisholm and Bar Counsel have both excepted to the proposed sanction. Chisholm denies that he violated either the Rules of Professional Conduct or the former Code of Professional Responsibility. 1 He asks that the charges against him be dismissed and that no discipline be imposed. Bar Counsel agrees that the court should…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- In Re RebackDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1986
- In Re HutchinsonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987
- In Re RoundtreeDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1985
- In Re SteeleDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1993
- In Re PeekDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1989
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- In Re CaterDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2005
- In Re BergerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1999
- In Re UkwuDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2007
- In Re GubermanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2009
- In Re ChapmanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2009
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.