Scranton Lackawanna Trust Co. v. Birbeck
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Chief Justice Kephart,
The defense to the note in suit was that defendant,- a married woman, executed it solely as an accommodation maker for one Karl Rogowski. On a previous appeal a judgment for plaintiff was reversed by this Court in 321 Pa. 375, for trial errors. At the second trial the jury returned a verdict for defendant on which judgment was entered.
Appellants complain of those portions of the charge which relate to the law applicable to a married woman’s endorsement of negotiable instruments, or to her becoming an accommodation maker of such paper. Some parts of the…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Sears v. BirbeckSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
- Mulheirn v. BrownSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
- Walters v. Western & Southern Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
- Yeany, ex rel. Gold Standard National Bank v. ShannonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1917
- Newtown T. T. Co. v. Underw'd (Et Al.)Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Spitzer v. Philadelphia Transportation Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
- Commonwealth v. TownsendSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1950
- Murphy v. TAYLORSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
- York Trust Company v. VanderslootSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
- Peoples-Pittsburgh Tr. Co. v. McCaffrey Et Ux.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.