York Trust Company v. Vandersloot

Per Curiam,

The controlling facts in this case are very similar to those in the case of Wilkes-Barre Deposit and Savings Bank v. Hermann, 334 Pa. 560. Judgment was entered on appellant’s note in 1925, being revived in 1928, and again in 1933. A fi. fa. was issued in 1937, and she then attempted to have the judgment opened, averring that she received no benefit from the note whatever, and was merely an accommodation maker, surety or guarantor for her husband. Judge Sheely in the court below refused to open the judgment. Under the authority of the case above cited, appellant was clearly barred…