Legal Opinion

United States v. Michael Lewis Clark

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided January 25, 2006No. 04-30249PublishedCited by 51 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McKEOWN, Circuit Judge.

In this appeal we are confronted with a question of first impression regarding the scope of Congress’s power under the Foreign Commerce Clause.1 At issue is whether Congress exceeded its authority “to regulate Commerce with foreign Nations,” U.S. Const, art. I, § 8, cl. 3, in enacting a statute that makes it a felony for any U.S. citizen who travels in “foreign commerce,” i.e. to a foreign country, to then engage in an illegal commercial sex act with a minor. 18 U.S.C. § 2423(c). We hold that Congress acted within the bounds of its constitutional authority.

Congressional…

2Cases cited53 opinions

  1. United States v. LopezSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  2. Gibbons v. OgdenSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
  3. National Labor Relations Board v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
  4. County Court of Ulster Cty. v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. Morton v. MancariSupreme Court of the United States · 1974

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by51 opinions

  1. Serra v. LappinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
  2. United States v. FrankCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2010
  3. United States v. Malek al-MalikiCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2015
  4. United States v. Larry BollingerCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2015
  5. United States v. NascimentoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2007

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API