Legal Opinion
Bostic v. United States Capitol Police
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided August 6, 2009No. Civil Action 07-1383 (EGS)PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
EMMET G. SULLIVAN, District Judge.
Pierre Bostic filed this action in response to the events of February 14-16, 2004, during which he was arrested by Daryl Banks of the United States Capitol Police and incarcerated for two days before being released. Bostic’s claims include: false arrest, false imprisonment, assault, battery, intentional infliction of emotional distress, and negligence. The District of Columbia and the federal defendants move to dismiss, or in the alternative, move for summary judgment. For the reasons stated below, both motions to dismiss will be GRANTED.
I.…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Papasan v. AllainSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Federal Deposit Insurance v. MeyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Blonder-Tongue Laboratories, Inc. v. University of Illinois FoundationSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Tookes v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- Briscoe v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- Abou-Hussein v. GatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009
- Davis v. Transportation Security AdministrationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
- Abou-Hussein v. GatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.