Legal Opinion
Briscoe v. United States
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided July 25, 2017No. Civil Action No. 16-cv-0809 (ABJ)PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
AMY BERMAN JACKSON, United States District Judge
This case arises -out of unfortunate and undisputed circumstances that for a period of time, a Special Agent of the FBI was fueling his own heroin addiction with evidence seized in federal criminal investigations. A group of individuals convicted of conspiracies he helped investigate, Albert Marcellus Briscoe, Merle Watson, and Donald Duren, have brought an action against defendants United States of America (“United States”), the Federal Bureau of Investigation (“FBI’’), the United States Department of. Justice (“DOJ”), Andrew…
2Cases cited60 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Kentucky v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Pacheco v. HudsonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2018
- Alan Metzgar v. KBR, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2018
- Blatt v. TouchetteVermont Superior Court · 2019
- Christian v. Giant Food StoresDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2022
- Christian v. SafewayDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2022
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.