Legal Opinion
PACEMAKER PLASTICS CO., INC. v. AFM Corp.
District Court, N.D. Ohio
Decided May 14, 2001No. 1:01-cr-00132PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GWIN, District Judge.
On March 26, 2001, the defendants 1 moved, under Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6), to dismiss the second amended complaint for failure to state a claim [Doc. 31]. Plaintiffs Pacemaker Plastics Co. Inc., Thermal Foams, Inc., and Therma Foam, Inc., oppose the motion. On April 17, 2001, the plaintiffs filed a motion to amend the judgment of the dismissal of the first amended complaint under Fed.R.Civ.P. 59(e) [Doc. 40]. For the reasons discussed below, the Court denies the plaintiffs motion to amend judgment and grants the defendant’s motion to dismiss the second amended…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Hishon v. King & SpaldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Samantha Sistrunk v. City of Strongsville and Bush-Quayle '92 Committee, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997
- Alan Weiner, D.P.M. v. Klais and Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Isp. Com LLC. v. TheisingIndiana Supreme Court · 2004