Legal Opinion
State v. Hubbard
Washington Supreme Court
Decided January 11, 1985No. 50562-4PublishedCited by 36 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtUtter, J.
May statements by a defendant, elicited by the State in violation of the rule set forth in Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 16 L. Ed. 2d 694, 86 S. Ct. 1602, 10 A.L.R.3d 974 (1966), be used as substantive evidence to rebut the testimony of a person other than the defendant? *572We hold they may not and reverse the judgment of the Court of Appeals. State v. Hubbard, 37 Wn. App. 137, 679 P.2d 391 (1984).
Thomas R. Hubbard was accused of shooting Peter Edwards, a heroin dealer. The murder occurred at about 10 p.m., June 1, 1981. Prior to trial, Hubbard moved to suppress any statements he may have…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Berkemer v. McCartySupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Harris v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Oregon v. HassSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- New York v. QuarlesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- State v. CopelandWashington Supreme Court · 1996
- Allied Daily Newspapers v. EikenberryWashington Supreme Court · 1993
- State v. BrownWashington Supreme Court · 1988
- State v. BrownWashington Supreme Court · 1990
- Babcock v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1991
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.