Legal Opinion

Allied Daily Newspapers v. Eikenberry

Washington Supreme Court

Decided April 1, 1993No. 59435-0PublishedCited by 170 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGuy, J.

This case presents a challenge raised by a number of press organizations to the constitutionality of section 9 of Substitute House Bill 2348 (the Act or SHB 2348), Laws of 1992, ch. 188, § 9. Section 9 requires courts to ensure that information identifying child victims of sexual assault is not disclosed to the public or press dining the course of judicial proceedings or in any court records. We hold that section 9 is unconstitutional because it violates the right of open access to judicial proceedings, as guaranteed under article 1, section 10 of the Washington State Constitution.

I

The…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Globe Newspaper Co. v. Superior Court, County of NorfolkSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Seattle Times Co. v. IshikawaWashington Supreme Court · 1982
  3. City of Seattle v. MesianiWashington Supreme Court · 1988
  4. State v. CoeWashington Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Federated Publications, Inc. v. KurtzWashington Supreme Court · 1980

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by170 opinions

  1. State v. Bone-ClubWashington Supreme Court · 1995
  2. State v. YoungWashington Supreme Court · 1994
  3. State v. Bone-ClubWashington Supreme Court · 1995
  4. In re the Personal Restraint of OrangeWashington Supreme Court · 2004
  5. State v. BrightmanWashington Supreme Court · 2005

165 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API