Legal Opinion

Black v. Bell

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided November 1, 1927No. 17129PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HERR. C.

The parties appear in this court as they did in the trial court ; that is, plaintiff in error was plaintiff below and defendant in error, defendant. They will be so referred to in this opinion.

This controversy grows out of the division of proceeds arising from the sale of oil and gas leases in which the defendant and plaintiff were jointly interested. These leases consisted of two tracts, one of 40 ac es. and the other of 160 acres. They were procured by the plaintiff from the owners, plaintiff contending that he paid therefor the sum of $4,000 and that the defendant had one-eighth…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Vickers v. Philip Carey Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  2. Hughes v. Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  3. Roeser v. PeaseSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  4. St. Louis S. F. R. Co. v. HurleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
  5. Burford v. BentonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Levi v. Oklahoma CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1947
  2. Parrish v. NicholsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  3. Ralston v. TuckerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1958
  4. City of Muskogee v. McMurrySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932
  5. Wilson v. HartinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API