Legal Opinion

Neslin v. Wells

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided January 18, 1882No. 98PublishedCited by 27 opinions

. Appeal from the Supreme Court of the Territory of Utah. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Matthews

This is a suit of an equitable nature, brought by Wells, Fargo, & Co., against Neslin and Smith, in the District Court of the Third Judicial District of the Territory of Utah, to foreclose a mortgage of real estate, made by Smith to Kerr, and by the latter assigned to them. Neslin claimed to be a prior mortgagee of the same land, and to be entitled to a lien preferable to that of the complainants.

A decree for the complainants was rendered in the District Court, establishing their mortgage as the first and best_lien. A motion for a new trial was made by Neslin. On that motion, a statemént in…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Stringfellow v. CainSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
  2. Colomer v. MorganSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1858

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Bear Lake & River Water Works & Irrigation Co. v. GarlandSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  2. Harrison v. PereaSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  3. Blennerhassett v. ShermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  4. Idaho & Oregon Land Improvement Co. v. BradburySupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  5. Cameron v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1893

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API