Legal Opinion
Lohr v. Watson
South Dakota Supreme Court
Decided January 27, 1942No. File No. 8462PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.
Plaintiff sought damages for alleged malpractice from defendant, a physician. The trial court directed a verdict for defendant at the close of plaintiff’s case. The principal assignment predicates error on that ruling.
Under well settled principles, we consider the evidence in the light most favorable to plaintiff. (Clinkscales v. Wisconsin Granite Co., 38 S. D. 205, 160 N. W. 843; Commercial & Savings Bank v. Duitsman, 48 S. D. 534, 205 N. W. 379), for the purpose of determining whether there is any substantial credible evidence which would have supported a verdict of the jury for plaintiff.…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Ramberg v. MorganSupreme Court of Iowa · 1928
- McKinnon v. PolkSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929
- Matuschka v. MurphyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1921
- Yates v. GambleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1936
- Wolff v. StengerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1931
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Magbuhat v. KovarikSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1986
- Block v. McVaySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1964
- Stevens v. Wood Sawmill, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1988
- Hansen v. IsaakSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1945
- Podio v. American Colloid CompanySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1968
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.