Legal Opinion
McKinnon v. Polk
Supreme Court of Alabama
Decided April 4, 1929No. 6 Div. 321PublishedCited by 38 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtThomas, J.
The suit is for personal injury alleged to have been negligently caused by the treatment of plaintiff’s physician. The rules given apxflieation to such action need not be repeated. Robinson v. Crotwell, 175 Ala. 197, 57 So. 23; Talley v. Whitlock, 199 Ala. 28, 73 So. 976; Knowles v. Blue, 209 Ala. 27, 95 So. 481; Knowles v. Dark & Boswell, 211 Ala. 59, 99 So. 312; Moore v. Smith, 215 Ala. 595, 111 So. 918; Peck v. Henderson, 22 Ala. App. 541, 118 So. 262; Carraway v. Smith; 218 Ala. 412, 118 So. 758; Carraway v. Graham, 218 Ala. 453, 118 So. 807.
The burden of proof was upon the plaintiff to…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Cobb v. MaloneSupreme Court of Alabama · 1890
- McMillan v. AikenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1920
- Southern Ry. Co. v. DicksonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1924
- Armstrong v. Montgomery Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1898
- Western Railway of Alabama v. MutchSupreme Court of Alabama · 1892
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- Griffin Lumber Co. v. HarperSupreme Court of Alabama · 1946
- City of Tuscaloosa v. FairSupreme Court of Alabama · 1936
- Bradford v. McGeeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1988
- Parrish v. SpinkSupreme Court of Alabama · 1969
- McAfee v. Baptist Medical CenterSupreme Court of Alabama · 1994
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.