Legal Opinion

Simmons v. Randforce Amusement Corp.

City of New York Municipal Court

Decided January 27, 1937PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWecht, J.

Plaintiff seeks to recover from the defendant the sum of $250 by reason of being the holder of the winning number drawn by the defendant on one of its “ bank nights.” The gravamen of the complaint is that the defendant operated what is commonly known as “ bank night;” the defendant advertised and requestéd its patrons and others to sign their names and addresses in a certain book furnished by the defendant. Opposite each name there was a number. The defendant openly advertised and represented to the public that public drawings of said numbers would be had and that the holder of the winning…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hamer v. . SidwayNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
  2. Allegheny College v. National Chautauqua County Bank of JamestownNew York Court of Appeals · 1927
  3. People v. Shafer, New York County Courts1936
  4. People v. ShaferNew York Court of Appeals · 1936
  5. People v. . Mail and Express CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1921

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Fried v. FisherSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  2. State v. JonesNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1940
  3. Dorman, Et Vir. v. Publix-Saenger-Sparks Theatres, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 1938
  4. State v. SternSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1937
  5. Shapiro v. Prudential TheatersNassau County District Court · 1972

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API