Legal Opinion

People v. Shafer

New York County Courts

Decided July 17, 1936PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKohlmetz, J.

For the purpose of attracting persons to the moving picture theatre of which the defendant was manager, a scheme was conducted known as bank nite, which the People claim is a lottery. The information charges that on the 12th day of June, 1936 the defendant offered “ property for disposal dependent upon the drawing of a lottery.” Briefly the details of the scheme are as follows: A book known as a registration book was placed in the lobby of the theatre and the purpose of this book was to obtain signatures of persons who desired to participate in a drawing for money donated by the theatre to…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Maughs v. PorterSupreme Court of Virginia · 1931
  2. State v. HundlingSupreme Court of Iowa · 1936
  3. State v. EamesSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1936
  4. People v. MillerNew York Court of Appeals · 1936
  5. People v. . Mail and Express CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1921

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Beck v. Fox Kansas Theatre Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1936
  2. Affiliated Enterprises, Inc. v. WallerSuperior Court of Delaware · 1939
  3. State Ex Rel. Stafford v. Fox-Great Falls Theatre Corp.Montana Supreme Court · 1942
  4. Little River Theatre Corp. v. State Ex Rel. HodgeSupreme Court of Florida · 1939
  5. American Broadcasting Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1953

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API