Legal Opinion

Connecticut Mutual Life Insurance v. Schurmeier

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 17, 1912No. Nos. 17,516—(115)PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Action in the district court for Ramsey county against Edward J. Schurmeier, Hubert O. Schurmeier, Emma A. Miller, and The United States Fidelity & Guaranty Company, to recover $9,876.19 upon an executors’ bond. From an order, Hallara, J., overruling their separate demurrers to the complaint, defendants appealed.

1Opinion of the CourtStart, C. J.

This is an appeal from an order of the district court of the county of Ramsey, overruling the separate demurrers of the several *474defendants to the complaint, and involves the question whether the complaint alleges facts sufficient to constitute a cause of 'action as to each and all of the defendants. Such allegations, so far as here material, are to the effect following:

On July 16, 1900, John H. Schurmeier, then a resident of the county of Ramsey, died testate, and his will was admitted to probate on December 27, 1900, by the probate court of that county. Thereupon the three individual…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Security Trust Co. v. Black River National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
  2. State ex rel. Matteson v. Probate CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1901
  3. Schurmeier v. Connecticut Mut. Life Ins.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1909
  4. Berkey v. JuddSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1881
  5. Johanson v. HoffSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1897

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In Re Estate of KoffelSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1928
  2. Schunk v. HotchkissSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
  3. Connecticut Mutual Life Insurance v. SchurmeierSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
  4. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. ClutterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
  5. Filtsch v. SipeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1946

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API