Legal Opinion

Schunk v. Hotchkiss

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 11, 1950No. 35,147PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Peterson, Justice.

Appeal from a judgment of the district court affirming an order of the probate court ordering the representative of decedent’s estate to pay as contribution to his judgment codebtors one-half the difference of the amount paid by the latter in excess of that paid by the representative in satisfaction of a judgment recovered against them in a personal injury action, and interest thereon.

The questions for decision are:(1) Whether the reinsurer of the insurer of a party claiming contribution from his judgment codebtor is the proper party to bring the proceeding for the recovery…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Ankeny v. MoffettSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1887
  2. Knutsen v. KrookSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1910
  3. American Motorists Insurance Co. v. VigenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1942
  4. Wold v. GrozalskyNew York Court of Appeals · 1938
  5. Barnes v. Hekla Fire Ins.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1893

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Fontenot v. Marquette Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1971
  2. American Automobile Insurance v. MollingSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1953
  3. Koenigs v. TravisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1956
  4. Schuylkill Products, Inc. v. H. Rupert & Sons, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  5. People Ex Rel. Baylor v. Highway InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 1974

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API