Legal Opinion

Johanson v. Hoff

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided November 15, 1897No. Nos. 10,717-(99)PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal by defendant Hoff from an order of tbe district court for St. Louis county, Ensign, J., overruling her demurrer to the complaint.

1Opinion of the CourtBuck, J.

On July 4,1893, one Neis J. Hoff died intestate, and about August 12,1893, letters of administration on his estate were issued to the defendant Celia Hoff by the probate court of St. Louis county, and ever since that date she has been the duly-qualified acting administratrix of said estate. Matters relating to the administration of said estate have been twice before this court (Johanson v. Hoff, 63 Minn. 296, 65 N. W. 464, and 67 Minn. 148, 69 N. W. 705), finally resulting in affirmance of the order of the district court of said county, where*141upon a judgment was entered in that court about…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Board of County Commissioners v. TowerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1881
  2. Johanson v. HoffSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1897
  3. Johanson v. HoffSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1895

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Connecticut Mutual Life Insurance v. SchurmeierSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
  2. Bolles v. BoyerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1919
  3. Connecticut Mutual Life Insurance v. SchurmeierSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1912
  4. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. ClutterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
  5. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Zimmer v. Craig's AdministratricesCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API