Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Matteson v. Probate Court

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided November 1, 1901No. Nos. 12,801—(180)PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Alternative mandamus issued out of the district court for Ramsey county on the relation of Max Matteson, directed to the probate court for said county and Hon. E. W. Bazille, judge thereof. From a judgment entered pursuant to an order of Otis, J., denying a peremptory writ and discharging the alternative writ, relator appealed.

1Opinion of the Court

START, c. j.

Sumner W. Matteson, a resident of the county of Ramsey, having real and personal property therein, died intestate on July 22, 1895. The Security Trust Company was duly appointed by the probate court of such county on September 3, 1895, administrator of his estate, and it duly qualified as such, and duly filed in such court an inventory of such estate. The probate court on the same day, by its order, which was duly published, limited the time for presenting claims against the estate to six months from the date of the order. All claims against the estate presented to the court…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Ladd v. WeiskopfSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1895
  2. Ganser v. GanserSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1901
  3. State ex rel. Dana v. Probate CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1889
  4. Hurley v. HamiltonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1887
  5. In re Scheffer's EstateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1894

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Hulburd v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  2. Security Trust Co. v. Black River National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
  3. Fridley v. Farmers & Mechanics Savings BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1917
  4. In Re Guardianship of StromSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1939
  5. In Re Estate of KoffelSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1928

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API