Legal Opinion

Bauer v. Williams

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 1, 1942No. Civ. 13577PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HANSON, J. pro tem.

In this case the question for decision is whether four letters addressed to different individuals, all in the handwriting of and signed by the decedent, may together be classed as a holographic will merely because one was dated and all were found in a desk drawer intermingled with other papers.

Each of the three undated letters indicates not only a testamentary intent but that death was immediately impending. Death did occur by suicide. The dated letter specifically directed that upon the death of the writer all of her money in designated deposit accounts along with American…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Estate of RathCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Sherman v. ShermanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  3. In re Estate of ShillaberCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
  4. Simon v. GraysonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
  5. Daytona Institute v. DowCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Estate of WunderleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Estate of BurnisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
  3. Estate of FritzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
  4. Treaster v. HamlinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
  5. Estate of MorrisonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API