Legal Opinion

Treaster v. Hamlin

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 19, 1956No. Civ. 4998PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CONLEY, J. pro tem. *

These are appeals from two complementary judgments denying probate to an alleged integral portion of a holographic will and determining that a granddaughter of the decedent, who is his sole surviving heir at law, is entitled to take the whole of his estate, valued at more than $115,000, to the exclusion of the devisees and legatees named in the will.

The decedent, Frank Blain, and his wife Wanda Berta Blain had one child, Carol, who married Otto Lambert; their only child is Sonia Lambert. The Blains had executed a property settlement agreement and an interlocutory decree…

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. Crawford v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Estate of Bristol v. YoungCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Teel v. GaskillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  4. Estate of WunderleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  5. DeParcq v. O'BrienCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Estate of HelmarCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
  2. People v. AquilanteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
  3. Estate of WongCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
  4. Estate of HazelwoodCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
  5. Simonelli v. ChiarolanzaNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2002

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API