Legal Opinion

Simon v. Grayson

California Supreme Court

Decided May 27, 1940No. S. F. 16199PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWaste, C. J.

The question presented for determination upon this appeal involves the construction and effect to be given a provision in a will purporting to incorporate a letter by reference. Respondent’s claim to certain of the estate’s funds is based upon the terms of the letter. The appellants, who are residuary legatees under the will, contend that the attempted incorporation by reference was ineffectual. The facts, which were presented to the trial court upon an agreed statement, are as follows:

S. M. Seeligsohn died in 1935. His safe deposit box was found to contain, among other things, a will and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. In Re Estate of PlumelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
  2. Martin v. McMullanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
  3. Keeler v. Merchants Loan & Trust Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1912
  4. Miller v. CarrascoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
  5. Garde v. GoldsmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Estate of WunderleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Estate of SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Soady v. First National BankNevada Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Bauer v. WilliamsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
  5. Sullivan v. JorgensenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API