Legal Opinion

Daytona Institute v. Dow

California Supreme Court

Decided February 14, 1923No. L. A. No. 7383PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLennon, J.

By an order for partial distribution in the above-entitled cause it was decreed that George S. Doane died intestate as to the residuary portion of his estate and that the residue of the estate be distributed to the'heirs at law. The correctness of this adjudication is the sole question raised upon the present appeal.

Clause tenth of the last will and testament of the decedent, dated April 28, 1920, provides :

“All the rest and residue of my property of whatever nature and wheresoever located, I give, devise and bequeath to the National Bank and Trust Company of Pasadena, a National Banking…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. In re Estate of WalkerlyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Lockbihler v. YoungCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  3. Marti v. AndersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  4. Land v. ClarkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  5. In re Estate of ShillaberCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Estate of RussellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Hembree v. QuinnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Kline v. Citizens National Trust & Savings BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
  4. Estate of McDoleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
  5. McCray v. Citizens Trust & Savings BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API