Twin City Construction Co. of Fargo v. ITT Industrial Credit Co.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WOZNIAK, Judge.
This is an appeal from a summary judgment, granting Twin City Construction Company final payment due from lender, ITT Industrial Credit Company, based on principles of third party beneficiary and unjust enrichment. ITT claims Twin City is not a third party beneficiary of the loan agreement and, further, that it has not been unjustly enriched. We affirm.
FACTS
Twin City contracted with Bridge Street Partnership for the construction of a Holiday Inn in New Ulm, Minnesota, in June 1979.
Construction began immediately, but halted in November after Twin City had completed…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Trans-Bay Engineers and Builders, Inc. v. Carla A. Hills, Secretary of Housing and Urban DevelopmentCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1976
- Buchman Plumbing Co., Inc. v. Regents of the U. of M.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1974
- Cretex Companies, Inc. v. Construction Leaders, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- Matter of Turners Crossroad Development Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- Rients v. International Harvester Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- register.com, Inc. v. Verio, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2004
- Southtown Plumbing, Inc. v. Har-Ned Lumber Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1992
- Mon-Ray, Inc. v. Granite Re, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2004
- Pennsylvania State Employees Credit Union v. Fifth Third BankDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2005
- Russell v. Bank of Kirkwood PlazaNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1986
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.