Legal Opinion

Hicks v. Dc Water & Sewer Authority

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided August 25, 2025No. Civil Action No. 2024-2288Published

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ERIK M. HICKS, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 24-2288 (TJK) DC WATER & SEWER AUTHORITY, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION In December 2022, officials at the District of Columbia Water and Sewer Authority rec- ommended that Erik Hicks be promoted and receive an accompanying salary increase, but that promotion has not materialized. So Hicks sued, claiming that the delay of his promotion was caused by discrimination based on his race, color, and age. His employer moves to dismiss for failure to state a claim. The Court agrees that Hicks,…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
  4. Brady v. Office of the Sergeant at ArmsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2008
  5. Baloch v. KempthorneCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2008

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API