Legal Opinion
Requa v. Regents of University of California
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 31, 2012No. A132778PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
JONES, P. J.
Appellants Joe Requa, Wendell G. Moen, Jay Davis, and Donna Ventura (hereafter collectively Retirees) all spent decades working at *216the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (Livermore). During their employment there, Livermore was operated by the University of California (the University or UC), a state agency governed by The Regents of the University of California (the Regents). After retiring from Livermore, Retirees all received University-sponsored group health insurance benefits.
In 2007, management and operation of Livermore was transferred from the University to a…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Silberg v. AndersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
- Committee on Children's Television, Inc. v. General Foods Corp.California Supreme Court · 1983
- Alcorn v. Anbro Engineering, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1970
- McCall v. PacifiCare of California, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2001
- Youngman v. Nevada Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Berman v. Regents of the University of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
- Cal Fire Local 2881 v. California Public Employees' Retirement SystemCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
- Russell City Energy Co. v. City of Hayward, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
- Sacramento County Retired Employees Ass'n v. County of SacramentoDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2013
- Hicks v. PGA Tour, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2016
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.