Legal Opinion

Brent v. Walmart Inc.

District Court, D. Kansas

Decided April 29, 2021No. 6:20-cv-01158Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS MICHELLE BRENT, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Case No. 20-cv-1158-TC-TJJ ) WALMART, INC., ) ) Defendant. ) MEMORANDUM AND ORDER This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff’s Motion for Leave to Amend to Add Claim for Punitive Damages Against Defendant (ECF No. 71). Plaintiff seeks leave to amend her complaint to include a claim for punitive damages. Defendant opposes the motion. Upon consideration of the matter, the Court finds the motion should be granted. Factual Background Plaintiff brings this action for injuries she allegedly…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  3. Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  4. Minter v. Prime Equipment Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
  5. Maher v. Durango Metals, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API