Legal Opinion
Maher v. Durango Metals, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided May 19, 1998No. 97-1025PublishedCited by 173 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MURPHY, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiff William J. Maher appeals the district court’s dismissal of his federal securities claims against Defendants Colina Oro Molino, Inc. (“COM”) and Gwen Fraser. Maher argues that COM and Fraser are hable as “control persons” under § 15 of the Securities Act of 1933 (“1933 Act”) and § 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“1934 Act”) for various violations of the securities laws allegedly committed by Defendant Durango Metals, Inc. (“Durango”), the issuer of the relevant stock. The district court dismissed Maher’s claims against COM and Fraser, concluding as…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Central Bank of Denver, N. A. v. First Interstate Bank of Denver, N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Shaw v. Digital Equipment Corp.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1996
- Securities and Exchange Commission v. First Jersey Securities, Inc. And Robert E. BrennanCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1996
- Pinter v. DahlSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by173 opinions
- Lustgraaf v. BehrensCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2010
- Beedle v. WilsonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005
- In Re Livent, Inc. Noteholders Securities Litig.District Court, S.D. New York · 2001
- City of Philadelphia v. Fleming Companies, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2001
- In Re MicroStrategy, Inc. Securities LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2000
168 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.