Legal Opinion

City of Greensboro v. Pearce

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided February 20, 1996No. COA94-1371PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EAGLES, Judge.

Plaintiff first argues that the trial court’s findings of fact do not support its conclusion of law that plaintiff has inversely condemned defendants’ entire tract. We agree and vacate the trial court’s order and remand for additional findings.

The United States Constitution provides, inter alia, that “private property [shall not] be taken for public use, without just compensation.” U.S. Const, amend. V. The North Carolina Constitution provides the same fundamental protection against private property being taken for public use without just compensation. Finch v. City of Durham,…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Long v. City of CharlotteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
  2. Responsible Citizens in Opposition to the Flood Plain Ordinance v. City of AshevilleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
  3. Finch v. City of DurhamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1989
  4. City of Jacksonville v. SchumannDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1964
  5. City of Charlotte v. SprattSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. North Carolina Department of Transportation v. CromartieCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2011
  2. Wilkie v. City of Boiling Spring LakesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API