Legal Opinion

Booma v. Bigelow-Sanford Carpet Co. Inc.

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided April 1, 1953PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLummus, J.

General Laws (Ter. Ed.) c. 156, § 46E, inserted by St. 1941, c. 514, § 2, provides as follows: “A stockholder in any corporation which shall have duly voted to consolidate with another corporation in accordance with section forty-six B or forty-six D, who, at the meeting of stockholders, has voted against such consolidation, if entitled to vote, or, if not entitled to vote, has registered his disapproval in writing with the corporation at or before said meeting, may, within thirty days after the date on which the articles of consolidation were filed, make a written demand upon the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Wellesley College v. Attorney GeneralMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1943
  2. Marcus v. Board of Street CommissionersMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1925
  3. Hood Rubber Co. v. Commissioner of Corp. & TaxationMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1929
  4. Arnold v. Commissioner of Corporations & TaxationMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1951

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. State v. RoggenkampWashington Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Eaton v. Federal National Mortgage Ass'nMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2012
  3. Lantner v. CarsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1978
  4. Cowles Publishing Co. v. State PatrolWashington Supreme Court · 1988
  5. State v. HutsellWashington Supreme Court · 1993

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API