Legal Opinion
Arnold v. Commissioner of Corporations & Taxation
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided September 13, 1951PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWilkins, J.
The petitioners, who have undertaken to form a charitable corporation, bring two petitions against the commissioner of corporations and taxation and the Secretary of the Commonwealth. One is by way of appeal under G. L. (Ter. Ed.) c. 180, § 6, as appearing in St. 1949, c. 692, § 1, and the other is for a writ of mandamus. The purpose of each petition is the same. The bringing of two petitions emanates from procedural doubts. The facts are agreed, and at the request of the parties, the cases are reported to this court without decision.
Annie H. Childs, late of Northampton, by her will appointed…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Bolster v. Commissioner of Corporations & TaxationMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1946
- Boston Chamber of Commerce v. Assessors of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1944
- Cunningham v. Commissioner of BanksMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1924
- Burbank v. BurbankMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1890
- BartlettMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1895
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- In the Matter of TroyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1973
- Chandler v. County CommissionersMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2002
- Randall's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1954
- Plymouth County Nuclear Information Committee, Inc. v. Energy Facilities Siting CouncilMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1978
- Booma v. Bigelow-Sanford Carpet Co. Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1953
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.