Legal Opinion

In Re Easysaver Rewards Litigation

District Court, S.D. California

Decided August 13, 2010No. 3:09-cr-02094PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER:

GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT PROVIDE COMMERCE’S MOTION TO DISMISS

DENYING DEFENDANT ENCORE MARKETING INTERNATIONAL’S MOTION TO DISMISS

GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO STRIKE

MICHAEL M. ANELLO, District Judge.

Before the Court are separate motions to dismiss by the two Defendants in this class action consumer rights case. The Court submitted the motions on the written briefs. Local Civ. R. 7.1(d)(1). For the reasons stated below, the Court DENIES the motion to dismiss by Defendant EMI, and GRANTS IN PART hand DENIES IN PART the motion by Defendant Provide.

I. Factual…

2Cases cited61 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Jena Balistreri v. Pacifica Police Department Al Olsen, Police Chief, Individually and as a Police AgentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
  4. In Re Burlington Coat Factory Securities Litigation. P. Gregory Buchanan, Jacob Turner and Ronald AbramoffCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
  5. United States v. Donald Lawrence Ritchie, Heather Horner, Claimant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003

56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Van Tassell v. United Marketing Group, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2011
  2. Welco Electronics, Inc. v. MoraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
  3. In re Sony Gaming Networks & Customer Data Security Breach LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2012
  4. In re Yahoo! Inc. Customer Data Sec. Breach Litig.District Court, N.D. California · 2018
  5. In re American Apparel, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2012

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API