Legal Opinion
Mathews v. Union Central Life Insurance
Supreme Court of Kansas
Decided April 12, 1919No. 21,928PublishedCited by 4 opinions
OPINION DENYING A REHEARING. Appeal from Jackson district court; Fred T. Woodburn, judge.'
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Burch, J.:
In a petition for a rehearing, the following queries are propounded:
“Has the doctrine of stare decisis become obsolete?
“Are courts and lawyers no longer justified in relying upon and following precedents established by this court?
“Are decisions of this court to be regarded as overruled by implication?
“Is there no longer any distinction between payment, and mere tender of payment, of a debt?”
The decisions alluded to as forming precedents calling for application of the doctrine of stare decisis are the following: Perkins v. Matteson, 40 Kan.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Sullivan v. DavisSupreme Court of Kansas · 1882
- Frame v. AshleySupreme Court of Kansas · 1898
- Slater v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1914
- Wey v. SchofieldSupreme Court of Kansas · 1894
- Fuller v. Wells, Fargo & Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1889
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Fulton v. Loew's, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 1953
- Mathews v. Union Central Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1920
- Mathews v. Union Central Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1923
- Cutler v. First National BankSupreme Court of Kansas · 1923