Legal Opinion

Mathews v. Union Central Life Insurance

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided April 12, 1919No. 21,928PublishedCited by 4 opinions

OPINION DENYING A REHEARING. Appeal from Jackson district court; Fred T. Woodburn, judge.'

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Burch, J.:

In a petition for a rehearing, the following queries are propounded:

“Has the doctrine of stare decisis become obsolete?
“Are courts and lawyers no longer justified in relying upon and following precedents established by this court?
“Are decisions of this court to be regarded as overruled by implication?
“Is there no longer any distinction between payment, and mere tender of payment, of a debt?”

The decisions alluded to as forming precedents calling for application of the doctrine of stare decisis are the following: Perkins v. Matteson, 40 Kan.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Sullivan v. DavisSupreme Court of Kansas · 1882
  2. Frame v. AshleySupreme Court of Kansas · 1898
  3. Slater v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1914
  4. Wey v. SchofieldSupreme Court of Kansas · 1894
  5. Fuller v. Wells, Fargo & Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1889

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Fulton v. Loew's, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 1953
  2. Mathews v. Union Central Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1920
  3. Mathews v. Union Central Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1923
  4. Cutler v. First National BankSupreme Court of Kansas · 1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API