Legal Opinion

Gila Valley Block Co. v. Industrial Commission

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided August 10, 1978No. 1 CA-IC 1862PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

NELSON, Judge.

This special action presents for review the question of the validity of Rule 29, Rules of Procedure for Workmen’s Compensation Hearings before the Industrial Commission of Arizona. We hold that Rule 29 is in excess of the statutory rule-making grant to the Industrial Commission and therefore invalid.

The workmen’s compensation claimant in this action filed a petition to reopen his claim on December 20, 1976. The State Compensation Fund accepted the petition to reopen on January 26,1977. The next written document in the record is a letter from the employer to the Commission…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Kennecott Copper Corp. v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1977

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Itt Courier v. Industrial Com'n of ArizonaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1984
  2. Hart v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1994
  3. Marriott Corp. v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1986
  4. Thomas v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API