Legal Opinion

McManus v. Red Salmon Canning Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 2, 1918No. Civ. No. 2384PublishedCited by 9 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the Court

ZOOK, J., pro tem.

This is an appeal upon the judgment-roll from a judgment for defendant in an action for' the wrongful death of plaintiff’s intestate, John McManus. The complaint alleges that defendant, a California corporation, hired decedent at San Francisco, as a seaman and also to do shore work for it on a voyage to Alaska; that on July 17, 1915, while decedent was working in a pile-driving crew for defendant near Naknek, Alaska, he was struck by a block that fell from defendant’s pile-driver and was killed; that the accident was caused by the defendant’s negligence in using a block and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. North Alaska Salmon Co. v. PillsburyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
  2. Ryan v. North Alaska Salmon Co.California Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Jennings v. Alaska Treadwell Gold Mining Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1909
  4. Osborne v. Home Life InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Thome v. MacKenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
  2. Hudson v. Von HammCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
  3. Wallan v. RankinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1949
  4. Victor v. SperryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
  5. Schultz v. Union Pacific RailroadCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API