Legal Opinion

Jennings v. Alaska Treadwell Gold Mining Co.

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided May 3, 1909No. 1,638PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MORROW, Circuit Judge.

This action was brought by the plaintiff in error under section 353 of the Alaska Code of Civil Procedure to recover damages for the death of plaintiff’s intestate caused by - the alleged negligence of the defendant in error in failing to maintain in a reasonably safe condition the machinery and other appliances used in operating a hoisting apparatus in defendant’s mining shaft-. The case was tried before a jury. At the conclusion of the testimony defendant’s counsel moved the court to instruct the jury to return a verdict for the defendant, for the reason that it was…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Pennock v. DialogueSupreme Court of the United States · 1829
  2. Stewart v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  3. Warner v. Texas & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1896
  4. Interstate Com. Commiss. v. B. & O. RAILROADSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  5. Tucker v. OxleySupreme Court of the United States · 1809

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Gray v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1970
  2. City of Fairbanks v. SchaibleAlaska Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Arizona Binghampton Copper Co. v. DicksonArizona Supreme Court · 1921
  4. Kulawik v. ERA Jet AlaskaAlaska Supreme Court · 1991
  5. McManus v. Red Salmon Canning Co.California Court of Appeal · 1918

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API