Legal Opinion

Ohio Mall Contractors, Inc. v. Dickinson

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided January 2, 1990No. 88-P-2025PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

Relator, Ohio Mall Contractors, Inc., applied to the city of Aurora for a conditional zoning permit for the purpose of building a condominium development in a district which had been zoned R-4. Under the terms of the Aurora Zoning Code, condominiums are a conditionally permitted use in R-4 districts.

Relator’s application was approved by the Aurora City Council on September 27, 1983 (effective October 27, 1983) in Resolution No. 1983-112. This resolution contained the following language:

“No development or construction shall be commenced until preliminary and final plats have been approved by…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. DraggoOhio Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Fondessy Enterprises, Inc. v. City of OregonOhio Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Nunamaker v. Board of Zoning AppealsOhio Supreme Court · 1982
  4. State ex rel. Wall v. GrossmanOhio Supreme Court · 1980
  5. DuBose v. Court of Common Pleas of Trumbull CountyOhio Supreme Court · 1980

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In Re Appeal of LoweSupreme Court of Vermont · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API