Legal Opinion

ORION IP, LLC v. Hyundai Motor America

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Decided May 17, 2010No. 2009-1130PublishedCited by 45 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GAJARSA, Circuit Judge.

Hyundai Motor America (“Hyundai”) appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas’s (the “district court’s”) ruling of no unenforceability for inequitable conduct and denial of Hyundai’s motion for judgment as a matter of law (“JMOL”) and a new trial. The district court denied the JMOL motion by finding inter alia that (1) U.S. Patent No. 5,367,627 (the “'627 patent”) was not invalid on anticipation or obviousness grounds; and that (2) it was not error (i) to instruct the jury that the critical date was November 10, 1988, (ii) to fail to…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Exergen Corp. v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2009
  2. I4i Ltd. Partnership v. Microsoft Corp.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2010
  3. Constant v. Advanced Micro-Devices, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
  4. Star Scientific, Inc. v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2008
  5. Finisar Corp. v. DirecTV Group, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2008

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by45 opinions

  1. Ddr Holdings, LLC v. hotels.com, L.P.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2014
  2. Whitserve, LLC v. Computer Packages, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2012
  3. Powell v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2011
  4. Retractable Technologies, Inc. v. Becton, Dickinson & Co.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2011
  5. Woods v. Deangelo Marine Exhaust, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2012

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API