Legal Opinion
Battey v. Eureka Bank
Supreme Court of Kansas
Decided January 5, 1901No. 11,766PublishedCited by 5 opinions
Error from Lyon district court; W. A. Randolph, judge.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Johnston, J.:
The principal question presented for decision is whether the Eureka Bank is entitled to a lien on the capital stock of the bank owned by William Martindale for an indebtedness owing by him to the bank. The Eureka Bank is a corporation organized under the laws of the state, with a capital stock of $50,000, divided into 500 shares. William Martin-dale, who was the owner of 298 of these shares, was a member of its board of directors, and its president. Edwin Tucker was cashier of the bank and in the active management of its affairs.
On July…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- National Bank v. MatthewsSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
- National Bank v. WhitneySupreme Court of the United States · 1881
- Gold-Mining Co. v. National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Logan County National Bank v. TownsendSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Bank v. LanierSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Kelly v. Central Union Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1917
- Faulkner v. Bank of TopekaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1908
- Hess v. EmerySupreme Court of Kansas · 1938
- Apple v. American Nat. BankSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
- Gould v. Fidelity State Bank of Dodge CitySupreme Court of Kansas · 1939