Vaughan v. Mashburn
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
HUDSON, Justice.
**429 Here we are asked to decide whether a medical malpractice plaintiff may amend a timely filed complaint to cure a defective Rule 9(j) certification after the statute of limitations has run, when the expert review required by Rule 9(j) occurred before the filing of the original complaint. The Court of Appeals concluded that Rule 9(j) does not permit a plaintiff to amend in these circumstances and affirmed the trial court's dismissal of plaintiff's medical malpractice complaint. Vaughan v. Mashburn , --- N.C. App. ----, 795 S.E.2d 781 (2016). Because we conclude that the…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Rowan County Board of Education v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1992
- Henry v. DeenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
- Jackson v. Guilford County Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1969
- Roberts v. William N. & Kate B. Reynolds Mem. ParkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
- Thigpen v. NgoSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2002
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Locklear v. CummingsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2018
- Preston v. MovahedCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2019
- Locklear v. CummingsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2018
- Charles Schwab & Co., Inc. v. MarilleyNorth Carolina Business Court · 2026
- Aspen Specialty Ins. Co. v. Nucor Corp.North Carolina Business Court · 2022
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.