Legal Opinion

Locklear v. Cummings

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided August 17, 2018No. 202A17PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

**354 This matter is before the Court based upon a dissent at the Court of Appeals. Locklear v. Cummings , --- N.C. App. ----, 801 S.E.2d 346 (2017). The dissent concluded that plaintiff pled "a claim of medical malpractice by a healthcare provider in her complaint, not a claim of ordinary negligence as asserted by the majority." Id. at ----, 801 S.E.2d at 352 (Berger, J., concurring in part and dissenting in part). We agree that the majority at the Court of Appeals erred when it converted plaintiff's claim of medical malpractice into a claim of ordinary negligence. See Viar v. N.C. Dep't of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Viar v. North Carolina Department of TransportationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2005
  2. Thigpen v. NgoSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2002
  3. Vaughan v. MashburnSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2018
  4. Locklear v. CummingsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2017

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Locklear v. CummingsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2018
  2. Durity v. Precision Walls, Inc.District Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API