Matter of Ferguson
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
MARTIN (Harry C.), Judge.
At the outset, we note that Ottie Lamb Ferguson, mother of the child involved, is a proper party to this proceeding. The order denying her motion for jury trial is interlocutory but does affect a substantial right within the meaning of N.C.G.S. 1-277(a) and is appealable. N.C. Const. art. I, § 25.
The question thus raised is whether the North Carolina constitutional requirement of trial by jury is applicable to a proceeding for termination of parental rights under Article 24B of Chapter 7 A of the General Statutes of North Carolina. We are of the opinion and hold that…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Hardware Dealers Mutual Fire Insurance v. Glidden Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Wagner Electric Manufacturing Co. v. LyndonSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Raleigh & Gaston Rail Road v. DavisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1837
- In Re Northwestern Bonding Co., Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1972
- Chowan & Southern Railroad v. ParkerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1890
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- In Re ClarkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
- Faircloth v. BeardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1987
- In re McCarrollSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
- Phillips v. PhillipsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
- In re M.H. & G.H.Montana Supreme Court · 2006
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.