Legal Opinion

Phillips v. Phillips

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided February 19, 1985No. 843DC350PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ARNOLD, Judge.

I

A primary question presented by this appeal is whether the plaintiff had a. right to trial by jury in this action based on the Equitable Distribution Act, G.S. 50-20, -21. The Act does not expressly or implicitly provide for jury trial. Rather, G.S. 50-21(a) states, in pertinent part, “. . . [n]othing in G.S. 50-20 or this section shall restrict or extend the right to trial by jury as provided by the Constitution of North Carolina.”

The North Carolina Constitution provides that “[i]n all controversies at law respecting property, the ancient mode of trial by jury is one of the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hall v. HallSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1983
  2. Matter of FergusonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
  3. In Re the Estate of WallaceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
  4. Hinton v. HintonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. McLeod v. McLeodCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
  2. Tankersley v. TankersleyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1990
  3. In Re Marriage of HerrMissouri Court of Appeals · 1986
  4. Kiser v. KiserSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1989
  5. Faircloth v. BeardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1987

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API