Legal Opinion

In re McCarroll

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided April 2, 1985No. 664A84PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Per curiam

No final judgment has been entered by the trial court with regard to the applicant’s appeal of the Board’s order denying his bar application. “As a general rule, interlocutory decrees are immediately appealable only when they affect a substantial right of the appellant and will work an injury to him if not corrected before an appeal from a final judgment.” Love v. Moore, 305 N.C. 575, 578, 291 S.E. 2d 141, 144 (1982); Equitable Leasing Corp. v. Myers, 46 N.C. App. 162, 265 S.E. 2d 240 (1980). Denial of applicant’s motion for production of documents affects no substantial right and is not…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Mills v. MooreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
  2. North Carolina State Bar v. DuMontSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
  3. Equitable Leasing Corp. v. MyersCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
  4. In Re Housing Authority of City of Charlotte.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
  5. Matter of FergusonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Davidson v. Knauff Insurance Agency, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1989
  2. Faircloth v. BeardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1987
  3. Marks v. MarksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
  4. Department of Transportation v. WolfeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1994
  5. McCall v. McCallCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API