Legal Opinion

Smith v. Brown

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided March 1, 1939PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtField, C.J.

This is an action of tort to recover compensation for personal injuries sustained by the plaintiff when the automobile in which she was riding collided with a motor truck in the State of Connecticut. The case *433comes before us on the exception of the defendant to the denial of a motion for a directed verdict in his favor. The only contention argued by him is that such a verdict should have been directed on the ground of the contributory negligence of the plaintiff. There was no error in this respect.

Since the case was brought in this Commonwealth its law — the law of the forum — governs matters…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Bushnell v. BushnellSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1925
  2. Clarke v. Connecticut Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1910
  3. Levy v. SteigerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1919
  4. Sooserian v. ClarkMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1934
  5. Boscarello v. New York, New Haven & Hartford RailroadSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1930

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Sampson v. ChannellCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1940
  2. Strout v. BurgessSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1949
  3. National Fruit Product Co. v. Dwinell-Wright Co.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1942
  4. Stern v. LiebermanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940
  5. Gregory v. Maine Central RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1945

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API