Legal Opinion
Hood Ex Rel. Mississippi v. Microsoft Corp.
District Court, S.D. Mississippi
Decided April 16, 2006No. 3:04 CV 800WSPublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING REMAND
WINGATE, Chief Judge.
Before this court are the following: (1) a motion by defendant Microsoft Corporation (“Microsoft”) asking this court to stay all proceedings pending transfer by the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation (“Judicial Panel”), said motion filed pursuant to Title 28 U.S.C. § 1407 1 [docket # 2]; (2) a motion by plaintiff Jim Hood, Attorney General ex rel. State of Mississippi (“Hood”) to remand this proceeding to State court, submitted under Title 28 U.S.C. § 1447(e) 2 [docket # 6]; and (3) a motion by plaintiff Hood for an expedited hearing on his…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Landis v. North American Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Wisconsin Department of Corrections v. SchachtSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Moor v. County of AlamedaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Manguno v. Prudential Property & Casualty InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2002
- Howery v. Allstate Ins CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2001
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- In re Standard & Poor's Rating Agency LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2014
- California v. Infineon Technologies AGDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2007
- Illinois v. SDS West Corp.District Court, C.D. Illinois · 2009
- Illinois v. AU OPTRONICS CORP.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2011
- Mississippi ex rel. Hood v. AU Optronics Corp.District Court, S.D. Mississippi · 2012
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.