Legal Opinion
Illinois v. SDS West Corp.
District Court, C.D. Illinois
Decided July 30, 2009No. 09-3128PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RICHARD MILLS, District Judge.
Defendants removed this case to federal court based on diversity jurisdiction.
Plaintiff moves for remand, arguing that diversity jurisdiction is lacking because the State of Illinois is the real party in interest.
This Court’s recent ruling in Illinois v. LiveDeal, Inc., 2009 WL 383434 (C.D.Ill. Feb.12, 2009) controls.
Motion to remand is allowed.
Costs and fees awarded to the State.
I
Invoking Illinois’ Consumer Fraud and Deceptive Business Practices Act (“ICFDBPA”), 815 ILCS 505/1 et seq., the Attorney General for the State of Illinois brought this action…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Alfred L. Snapp & Son, Inc. v. Puerto Rico Ex Rel. BarezSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Carol B. Oshana v. Coca-Cola Company, a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2006
- Jane Doe v. Allied-Signal, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
- Postal Telegraph Cable Co. v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Nuclear Engineering Company v. William J. Scott, Illinois Ex Rel. William J. Scott v. Nuclear Engineering CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1981
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Department of Fair Employment & Housing v. Lucent Technologies, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- In re Standard & Poor's Rating Agency LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2014
- Lg Display Company v. Lisa MadiganCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2011
- WEST VIRGINIA EX REL. McGRAW v. Comcast Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2010
- Illinois v. AU OPTRONICS CORP.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2011
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.