Legal Opinion
Mississippi ex rel. Hood v. AU Optronics Corp.
District Court, S.D. Mississippi
Decided May 3, 2012No. Cause No. 3:11-CV-345-CWR-FKBPublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
CARLTON W. REEVES, District Judge.
Pending before the Court is the plaintiffs motion to remand. Docket No. 19. The defendants have responded in opposition, Docket No. 25, the plaintiff has replied, Docket No. 29, and the Court is ready to rule. The motion to remand will be granted.' Also pending is the defendants’ motion to strike portions of the plaintiffs reply brief. Docket No. 30. That motion is fully briefed, see Docket Nos. 31 & 33, and will be granted.
I. Factual and Procedural History
On March 25, 2011, the State of Mississippi filed a complaint in the Chancery Court of Hinds County…
2Cases cited57 opinions
- Metropolitan Life Insurance v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. CampbellSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Antonio Abrego Abrego v. The Dow Chemical Co Shell Oil Company, D/B/A Shell Chemical Company, and Shell Agricultural Chemical CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- Nevada v. Bank of America Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- Maryland v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Mississippi Ex Rel. Hood v. AU Optronics Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2014
- Bridges v. FreeseDistrict Court, S.D. Mississippi · 2015
- Hood v. JPMorgan Chase & Co.District Court, S.D. Mississippi · 2013
- Gilman v. Intel CorporationDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2020
- Johnny Javier Hernandez Cruz v. Warden Rafael Vergara, Adams County Correctional CenterDistrict Court, S.D. Mississippi · 2026
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.